Skin Color
By: Zeina Jabali
In The Color Complex, the authors introduce the complexities
of interracial marriage among the African American community by pointing out the
color preferences that both black males and females find attractive in their
partners. The authors argue that although people may believe that the time for
judgments based on color have passed, in reality, these judgments remain
intact. Interracial marriages, however, are becoming more “normal” where in
1972 39% of whites thought such an act was unacceptable, but in 1991 that
figure dropped to 7% (Russell, Wilson, and Hall). The authors explain the rise
in Black women marrying White men by pointing out that there is a decrease in
eligible black men which could be attributed to their high unemployment rate
and criminal behavior. They also note that Black men choose White women for
many reasons including the fact that Blacks were forbidden from having
relationships with white women making them more desirable; this can be
described as the forbidden fruit conundrum. Another theory holds that after
women travelled to the south for the Civil Rights Movement, Black men wanted to
“affirm their manhood”, and so, sought to pursue these northerners. This
history is used to explain why Black men are attracted to lighter skinned
females who are “light but not quite”.
The complexity involved with interracial relationships lies in
the reactions of society and the impact it may have on one of the partners. For
example, if a Black man only dated light skinned females then society would think
he had a color complex; but if he exclusively dated dark skinned women then
society would perceive him as less of a man because he “could not do any
better” (Russell, Wilson, and Hall). When a light skinned man dates a darker
woman he would be accused of wanting to go back to his roots. Society places
heavy judgment on interracial relationships making it difficult for people to
take part in them. Another factor that contributes to their complexity is the
psychological affect dating a light skinned woman may have on a darker skinned
man or the impact such a relationship may have on the psyche of the woman. For
instance, in Calvin Herntons Sex and
Racism in America, the speaker’s wife frequently refers to him as a “Black
Bastard”, resenting his darker color. What occurs more often, however, is that
the husband becomes envious of his wife’s skin color causing him to feel
inferior leading him to believe that he must affirm his dominance. This results
in domestic and sexual abuse. One light skinned woman said that her husband
beat her during sex and called her a “half-breed bitch” (Russell, Wilson, and
Hall).
I would never have guessed that African American society
thought this way. Reading this chapter was a complete shock to me! The closest
I have ever come to understanding such a culture was when we were reading Invisible Man in High School and I noted
that the author made sure to bestow the man who was leading the African
revolution through violence with extremely dark skin, and the man who was
working with the Whites through peace had extremely light skin. I also noted
that white women in the novel were extremely drawn to the Black men and had
“Jungle Fever”. I can, however, understand how some people may want to keep
their gene pool as is and marry someone similar to them.
The author of Yearning for
Lightness discusses three major attributions to the “white is right” ideology
of the Global South. First is the correlation between skin lightening and
global capital; here the author attributes the mushrooming of the yearning for
lightness to the Internet. The Internet has allowed for “all of the players in
the global lightening market [to] meet. Large multinationals, small local
firms, individual entrepreneurs, skin doctors, direct sales merchants, and even
eBay sellers use the Internet to disseminate the ideal of light skin and to advertise
and sell their products” (Glenn 283). Secondly, Glenn discusses different
regions around the world and the reasons for their desire to be “white”, which
often is due to the upper class or government –as is in colonialism- having
fair skin. In Japan exists the Mikiko Ashikari, in Philippines exists an
admiration towards Americans and Spaniards- who also admire white skin, and so
on and so forth. The lower class looks to the upper class for guidance and
trend setting, so when majority of the upper class has whiter skin, the lower class
will follow suit. Lastly, Glenn discuses the multinational Cosmetic and
Pharmaceutical firms and their targeting strategies. She identifies the three
largest corporations in the skin lighting industry as L’Oreal, Shiseido, and
Unilever, but the company I am most familiar with is called Fair and Lovely; a
subsidiary of Unilever. The commercials for this brand promise consumers to
have “natural radiant fairness in just 6 weeks” and tell them to “unveil
perfect skin”. The most immediate way these corporations have been promoting a
“white is right” ideology in India is by sponsoring the Famina Miss India
pageant where the winners are usually the lightest skinned of the lot. Also,
commercials that express the benefits of beauty achieved from being fair are
widespread and effective because they paint dark skin in a very unflattering
light only to contrast that experience with the benefits that come with
fairness, which is, of coarse, only achieved through the use of Fair and
Lovely.
Growing up in a country that
is home to many from Pakistan, India, Africa, and the Philippines I have
witnessed first hand just how important it is to be fair. My housekeepers, who
are all from the Philippines, often speak of white skin and the beauty
associated with such a feature, and many Indian housekeepers almost always
agree with them. The beauty of white skin is also a phenomenon that exists among
the Arab World. Kuwaitis value fair skin because it conveys a family’s
progression away from Kuwait’s pearl diving and nomadic past to a new
westernized and globalized economy. My sisters friends often comment on her
skin color calling her “Casper”, after the ghost, she does not mind being
called this because she understands their desire to be that white and because
they are her friends and it is a little bit funny. Also, I have seen hundreds
of Far East Asians carrying umbrellas in sunny weather or wearing large hats.
The idea of fair skin perceived as beautiful is not at all new to me so I can
understand the idea behind it, I, however, prefer it when my skin is tan and I
think everyone looks better with a tan, so if I had a darker skin color all the
time I would not mind as much. I guess you could say I prefer everybody in
their natural state because they are generally more beautiful that way.
Zeina's post was very on point. She included all of the main ideas of the article and I found myself nodding my head after every sentence! I'd like to reflect on her last paragraph about skin-lightening practices. Although I have never experienced this dilemma, I have a very close friend who has. When I lived in Switzerland, I had a best friend who was from India. After I moved back to the States, she came and visited me in the summer. I live right down the street from the beach so I took her there, seeing as it was a beautiful, sunny day. But the entire time we were there, she didn't take off her cover up or leave the umbrella. I was tanning in a bikini and I kept asking her to join me, but she wouldn't! She actually said, "I don't want to get darker than I already am." This was a huge shock to me. This example not only outlines how skin-lightening is so prevalent in countries like India, but also how skin-darkening is popular here. A lot of people in the States would choose to be darker rather than paler. Zeina's experiences made me think of mine and how they all tie together.
ReplyDeleteKelsey Warkentin