Monday, November 5, 2012


Jill Dahrooge

            In these chapters, skin color seems to be a worldwide problem.  The Color Complex, described by the author, does not necessarily relate to interracial marriages or African American women using hair straightening products or color contacts, it is more about an "individual that can make choices more freely and can better resist social practices and cultural attitudes that are meaningless and unfair." Most African Americans struggle with the stereotypes of their race.  As Evelyn Nakano Glenn describes it in "Yearning for Lightness", blackness symbolizes a lack of civilization, unrestrained sexuality, pollution, and dirt.   There is a popular trend (or even need) to look like European decent instead of Latino or African.  The pressures of having light skin not only stem from products and media produced by European countries but from the internal pressures of the white and black races.  Marriages are the creator of the skin coloring issue.  More commonly black men are married to white women than black women are married to white men.  Lighter skin tones comes across as having a higher social status.  Because of the historical struggle of the black race, black men feel as if they have "made it" and have turned out as "winners" because they have married into a higher status. Even though the women themselves might not be of a wealthier class, their skin color says otherwise.  Females appear to be the ones that are mostly targeted in this skin color problem.  Black women struggle to find spouses because of their dark and "dirty" skin tone, which relates nothing to their personality or social status.  However, lighter skin women do not have it easier either.   They are sometimes seen as trophies to black men and are used to be shown off.  In relation to this, white men who marry black women use these women to show off in a different manner.  Black women are seen as exotically different; therefore, a white man feels as if he has accomplished the impossible and has stepped outside of the normal boundaries, giving him self-satisfaction.  It appears that women are both the black or white race struggle with stereotypical judgments. 

            However, during the 1930s and the 1940s tanning became a new social craze.  Tan skin meant a person was of a higher status because they could afford to travel to tropical beaches.  But quickly, this craze ended because of the medical discoveries of sun damage that were made.  My question about these chapters is that if the tanning epidemic was quickly shut down because of medical issues why isn't the skin lightening epidemic decreasing also?  Skin lightening exposes people to large amounts of mercury yet products are still being widely sold and popularized.  If the medical troubles were taken more seriously, races would most likely be able to live in peace and the stereotypes would not continue.

7 comments:

  1. Lily Cannon
    I think Jill makes a really good point when she brings up the question why isn’t the skin lightening epidemic decreasing also since the tanning epidemic quickly shut down because of the medical issues. Throughout the article they describe the dangers of both tanning and skin lightening and I believe the medical issues for skin lightening are just or even worst than tanning. It stated in the article that it could lead to “neurological damage and kidney disease” and more. Comparing both skin treatments; tanning and skin bleaching, still brings up the question, why do people even do it? I am guilty to say that I have tanned before for a prom or a special occasion but never went on a consistent basis. These people with the obsession to look lighter or dark is life threatening. When I went to Ghana two summers ago I noticed the various products that were being sold to lighten your skin tone and that was the first I have ever heard of such a thing. I remember talking to locals about those products and how many people do use it but it is getting less and less popular because of the dangers.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Charlotte Sargent

    In response to what Jill says about how black men feel they have “made it” and have turned out as “winners” because they have married a woman of lighter skin, meaning higher status, is somewhat remarkable considering how far we’ve come with equality. As Jill said just because of a woman’s skin color, she is considered and perceived as higher status and class even though she might not even be successful in any way. This goes to show how greatly society still judges just by skin color and how society emphasizes and portrays status and power. I also think it is interesting as Jill said, how black and white woman struggle with finding spouses because black women may be perceived as “dirty” or they may be seen as exotic or shown off as a trophy, as white women are too. Skin color still plays a huge role in our culture and causes people of different color to struggle and deal with stereotypes that our society creates and does not change.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Anna Grofik

    As Jill discussed, most African Americans will deal with racial stereotypes when considering the color of their skin and the color skin of their significant other. However, I disagree with Jill's idea that the institution of marriage is the creator of the problem of the color complex. While this institution brings attention to how much of a factor skin color is in our romantic interests, it is not the sole origin of the prejudice that exists for both dark and light skin in African Americans. Pertaining to Jill's question of why the skin lightening practices would not cease to exist due to their risky nature, I believe the answer lies in what skin color you originate with. If a white person learns that tanning is harmful, they can go back to a skin color that is not stigmatized. However, that is not the case for an African American person who wishes to change from a stigmatized skin color to a more 'socially ideal' lighter skin color.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Natalie Bennett
    When you brought up the point about it being more common for black men to marry white women than for black women to marry white men, it made me wonder. You said this occurs because it somehow shows the black man has 'won' but does that mean that a white man marrying a black woman has 'lost'? And does it not matter if the women win or lose? It also brought me back to the very disturbing section where it talks about these darker skinned husbands asserting their power over their light wives because their skin color makes them feel inferior.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Gracie Hall

    Of course, I was also shocked by the statement that dark men marry white women and parade them around as a symbol of status. First of all I am disturbed by any statement that equates a women with property or as a trophy, but furthermore I am shocked that skin color has a part to do with this. Notably, this dynamic is not unheard of, open up any tabloid magazine and you will see celebrity pairings that confirm this trend. What I did find surprising, however, were some specific men that chapter 7, "Dating and Mating" cited. Fredrick Douglass, Leslie Perry, Walter White, and Richard Wright all married white women. Now I am certainly not judging them, and I am 100% for interracial marriage, but I can't deny the fact that I was surprised when I heard that such influential men in the black community, who were so specifically dedicated to racial equality married non-black women. The chapter states two theories as to why this idea of "marrying out" is so prevalent. 1. That Blacks still perceive Whites as superior and marry them to elevate their own status or as proof of their success. And 2. Powerful people are simply attracted to each other and that high-profile Blacks have few opportunities to marry other high-status Blacks. I think in the case of these men, and the other artists and celebrities cited, it might be more complicated than either of those two theories.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Jill made a good point by bringing up the attitudes of people regarding the different shades of African American skin tones. Black women that use hair straightening products and color contacts are considered as women taking control of their lives. Like Jill pointed out, they are just falling prey to what society deems appropriate for a black woman to look like. The driving force behind women wanting their skin to be lighter is the desire for men to marry a women with lighter skin. Just as Jill stated, men who marry white women feel as though they have won and have a trophy. This must make black women with darker skin feel horrible. If white skinned women are considered "winning", then I can't imagine how that would make a dark skinned-black person feel.

    ReplyDelete
  7. TJ Brady- In response to Jill asking why tanning has slowed down because of health concerns while whitening has continued, I think it's because some people view the risk to be lighter is better than still being dark. A white person tanning could be seen as a luxury because they already have what African Americans want, lighter skin. Since there are health concerns, they can afford to not become tan because they still have high social status. African Americans don't have that option, which is why I think that skin whitening is still occurring. I don't agree with any of this but this is just why I think it is still occurring.

    ReplyDelete