This week we looked at chapter 3, “Size Matters” from Shari
L. Dworkin and Faye Linda Wach’s Body
Panic, as well as “Beyond Muscle and Fat” from Pope, Phillips, and
Olivardia’s The Adonis Complex. “Size Matters” by looking primarily at
female bodies, and the images of these bodies in correlation to “gendered power
relations and consumption”. The portrayal of women’s bodies as small and
“lacking” contributed to the somewhat accepted view that men are
over-determined as the powerful, privileges, and active subjects, and it is for
this reason that male bodies are incapable of being objectified. However, what
Dworkin and Whach’s chapter argues is that although men are still the possessors
in the object/subject dichotomy, there is evidence that they’re bodies (within
the subject sphere) have become objectified. This is because men are not
unified and because of the “third wave crisis of masculinity” in which manhood
and masculinity are being challenged, and therefore built, cut bodies are being
rebutted.
This
chapter focuses on the beginning on explaining the term moral panic. It
references the panic that erupted from the spreading of AIDS and how this panic
questioned ideals of masculinity, sexuality, and gender. However, it states
that this was only true of some men, and that other men in “dominant
categories” were forgiven and successfully redeemed. Powerful, heterosexual
men’s contraction of AIDS was explained because of their hyper-masculine
behavior of “scoring”. This opening section also touched on notions of the
“folk angel” and “folk devil”, the privilege/oppression relationship, the connection
between individualized anxieties and the broader structure of postindustrial
culture, and ultimately one of the current “body panics”: obesity.
It is this
final body panic that leads to the meat of the chapter. This new spread fear of
body fat and it’s out of control; unproductive, morally inferior connotations
have condemned the out of shape body. During this time of transition, men have
for the most part become less and less satisfied with their bodies. This shift
allows for the contemporary male body to become a profit-generating commodity
through the determination to bulk up. On page 73 Dworkin and Whach state: “When
one explores the construction of the ideal man today, certainly size matters.”
The rest of the text expands on this concept of male muscle “size” and it’s
implications.
By
examining fitness magazines Dworkin and Whach collected most of their data and formulated
their themes: size, power and strength, natural elements, the links made
between men’s fitness, the military, sports, fears od social feminization, and anti
feminization.
Size
historically expects that men be large, and women small. Men should “firstly be
big, and secondarily be cut” and that healthy and fit men are “defined by the
image of musculature, muscle size, greater muscle density, and less body fat.”
By looking through men’s fitness magazines Dworkin and Whach found that this
focus comes across in the workouts, with 87.8% explicitly promoting an increase
in muscle size and density whereas women’s workout where the majority of
emphasis was placed on size reduction. On page 77 Dworkin and Whach state: “If
we were to accept that men are naturally bigger and stronger than women, it
seems surprising that gaining size wouldn’t be recommended for women” and yet,
this is not the case. Instead women are expected to maintain their small size
and remain compact. Magazine article
statistics show that while men are encouraged to work on increasing the size
and strength of the upper body while women’s articles focus on the lower body
and remaining “toned”. These articles restrict how much size women should gain
by not encouraging intense upper body workouts and devaluation women’s
strength. Culture and media, as we have seen before, plays a significant role
in defining these idealized bodies.
It is
through our culture and media that the next theme of power and strength is
conveyed. Men are encouraged to work for an elite athletes body and maintain a
practically no-fat diet, otherwise they are “making excuses”, “not showing
commitment”, “lacking self control”, and “lacking a moral fortitude”. Our
society expects them to have “explosive” workouts, and “shredded abs”. We
constantly relate their bodies to hard-man made or natural elements like
“steel”, “iron”, “diamond”, “granite”, or “rock hard”. They should be
essentially, invincible. This chapter states that because of the shifting
gender relations, men are trying to redefine their manhood and this is coming
across through the consumer culture’s imperative toward strength.
Our new
obsession with physical fitness at its core is about “redeeming manhood,
re-energizing masculinity, and restoring force, dynamism and control to males
in a culture full of doubts and contradictions about men’s futures.” Men are
currently looking to hyper-masculine forms and institutions to promote and
encourage this new fitness trend. The military, law enforcement, and
firefighters not only inspire workouts but also inspire “a safety, security,
and freedom”. By having a nation of bulky strong white, middle class men and
athletes we as a nation exude a strong military presence and an essence of
empire and power.
Dworkin and
Whach also state that another one of the motivators for increased size and
power is the fear of social feminization and an effort to maintain their
manhood. For this reason workouts in media connect men’s workouts to sport,
power, and sex and women’s to fitness and maintaining a compact size; creating separate
spheres. Ultimately, it is this “crisis of masculinity” that has lead to another
“common historical trend: overt antifeminism.”
Because of
“the sport and fitness movement, the success of the second wave of feminism, an
increase of women in male realms, an increasing role of fathers in family life,
and broader emotional displays for the most privileged men” the gap between men
and women has slowly started to close.” This has created a fear of the “crisis
of masculinity” and an increase in men’s fitness regimens and an emphasis on
size and power. This is clearly related to a hegemonic masculinity and a fear
of social feminization. Currently fueling this trend is our consumer culture,
economic growth, and individual anxieties.
The other
chapter “Beyond Muscle and Fat” from Pope, Phillips, and Olivardia’s The Adonis Complex contradicts Dworkin
and Whach’s chapter in more ways than one. Although it also focuses on the
increase in observance in male appearance it looks more closely at the
individual instead of the entire male population, and observes bodily concerns
of men other than just muscle size and strength.
Readers
begin by looking at Steve, a man who is never convinced he looks good, or even
presentable. He is constantly focused on his hair and his love handles. He
won’t even believe his girlfriend Alison when she tells him “he looks good”.
Steve constantly wears a baseball hat, avoids certain restaurants, won’t let
his girlfriend touch his hair, has spent upwards of three hundred dollars in
the past three years and most of the time feels terrible. Steve is suffering
from what Pope, Phillips, and Olivardia call the “Adonis Complex.”
The Adonis
Complex is found in men who constantly worry about parts of their bodies other
than muscle and fat. A recent study showed that 43% of male respondents were
dissatisfied with their overall appearance. This has lead to a
penis-enlargement industry, as well as an increase in plastic surgery, beauty
products, and beauty services for men. Pope, Phillips, and Olivardia even state
that men instead of women are becoming more obsessed with their bodies: “It’s
ironic that as women have become increasingly aware of—and a little more
liberated from—society’s unreachable standards of beauty, men are increasingly
and unknowingly falling prey to the very same forces.”
Unlike
“Size Matters”, “Beyond Muscle and Fat” looks at the individual and specific
conditions. Readers are exposed to Body Dysmorphic Disorder and the silent
suffering that goes along with it. Decrease in or nonexistent intimate
relationships, suicide attempts, a poor quality of living, exuberant funds and time,
neurotic behavior, body mutilation and plastic surgery have all been a result
of this condition that effects 1 to 2% of the population. Hair and penis size are two of the biggest
concerns in addition to breasts, body hair and height, all of which are ultimately
tied back to masculinity and “manliness”. Men are treated through psychotherapy,
antidepressants, cognitive-behavioral therapy and response prevention, however
it is a condition that is almost impossible to “cure”. Although BDD is an
extreme state of the Adonis Complex, it is a prime example of the way certain
men have become increasingly concerned with their bodies. Both chapters
expanded on this awareness and highlighted the ways in which our consumer
industry has fueled this shift. Like male beauty works in Japan accepted and encouraged
ideals of masculinity have caused personal anxieties and new “norms”.
When I read about Steve and his obsession with his hair and love handles, and saw how it affected his relationship with his wife and just his overall life, I immediately thought that this was the equivalence of a woman having an eating disorder. Steve’s irrational worries about not looking good or presentable and avoiding certain restaurants and covering up parts of his bodies that he’s uncomfortable with all point to the neurotic tendencies that befall anorexic and bulimic women. Women with eating disorders tend to avoid certain places and wear baggier clothes to cover up their bodies which they see as “fat” and “unattractive”, although everyone else can see that they aren’t overweight at all, and are in fact the opposite and too skinny. My connection to this can best be summed up by the quote Gracie used: “It’s ironic that as women have become increasingly aware of—and a little more liberated from—society’s unreachable standards of beauty, men are increasingly and unknowingly falling prey to the very same forces.”
ReplyDeleteJane Vinocur
when reading these articles i continually asked, what does it meant to be a ideal man. in class we have talked a lot about what a ideal woman is based upon the effects of social media, but i have never really took into account of what it means to be an real ideal man. for men Gracie stated such as steve, the ideal man is not something in which they are. BDD is a serious disorder in which i am very fortunate i do not have because of the struggles that men such as steve and charlie have as stated in the article. Gracie's post was very in depth and very informative about the articles, also it allowed me to take what we have learned in class and put it into a males perspective.
ReplyDeletebobby
DeleteI thought that the view on AiDS was really different and well expressed in this article. I like how you acknowledged the difference in the outbreak: how some men got it for doing stuff that seemed "shameful", and some got it from scoring and getting lots of women. AKA, if a straight man got it, it was because he could get girls. If a gay man got it, it was because he was being punished. This view itself is incredibly twisted, and also shocking that people could bend reality like that to fit their prejudiced beliefs.
ReplyDeleteZael